The Structural Logic of the Brain’s Representation of Space: How Studies in Rodents can Inform Architectural Design for Humans

From Design Computation
(Redirected from DCIO.2021.UDSU8630)
Jump to: navigation, search
DCIO2021-Logo.png
DC I/O 2021 Keynote Paper by KATE JEFFERY.
DCIO2021 k-Jeffery.png

Abstract

Architects design buildings for humans to use, and as such, it is relevant to consider how it is that we internally represent space, because this highlights factors that should be prioritised in design. Recent discoveries in neuroscience, made by studying the neural activity patterns in rodents, have uncovered a spatial mapping system that is recruited when physically moving around in a space. This system evidently exists in humans too. The core of the system is formed by sets of neurons that seem to be sensitive to, or “encode”, fundamental aspects of space including the location of the agent within it and its facing direction, how far it is away from the borders and the identity and overall structural symmetry of the space itself. Study of how these neurons adjust their activity when these aspects of the space, or of the subject within it, are changed has yielded insights about how space is mapped. One of the oddest findings has been that – all other things being equal – the fundamental metric structure of this “cognitive map” is hexagonal. In this paper I outline the basics of the cognitive mapping system, describe the properties that have emerged from studying it in rats and mice, and then consider how these might influence architectural design for humans.

Presentation

Left Video Recording.

Conference Paper

Left Conference Paper.

Keywords

Space Representation, Neuroscience, Brain Structure.

Reference

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47330/DCIO.2021.UDSU8630

Bibliography

  • ANDERSON, M.I. AND JEFFERY, K.J. 2003. Heterogeneous modulation of place cell firing by changes in context, J.Neurosci, 23, 8827–8835.
  • ARONOV, D. AND TANK, D.W. 2014. Engagement of neural circuits underlying 2D spatial navigation in a rodent virtual reality system, Neuron, 84, 442–456. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.042.
  • BARRY, C. ET AL. 2007. Experience-dependent rescaling of entorhinal grids, Nature Neuroscience, 10. doi:10.1038/nn1905.
  • CALTON, J.L. ET AL. 2003. Hippocampal place cell instability after lesions of the head direction cell network., The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 9719–9731. doi:23/30/9719 [pii].
  • CARPENTER, F. ET AL. 2015. Grid cells form a global representation of connected environments, Current Biology, 25, 1176–1182. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.037.
  • CASALI, G., BUSH, D. AND JEFFERY, K. 2019. Altered neural odometry in the vertical dimension, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116. doi:10.1073/pnas.1811867116.
  • CONSTANTINESCU, A.O., O’REILLY, J.X. AND BEHRENS, T.E. 2016. Organizing conceptual knowledge in humans with a gridlike code, Science (New York, N.Y.), 352, 1464–1468.
  • DERDIKMAN, D. ET AL. 2006. Breaking up the entorhinal grid in a hairpin maze, Soc.Neurosci.Abstr.
  • DOELLER, C.F., BARRY, C. AND BURGESS, N. 2010. Evidence for grid cells in a human memory network, Nature, 463, 657–661. doi:10.1038/nature08704.
  • DUVELLE, É. ET AL. 2021. Hippocampal place cells encode global location but not connectivity in a complex space, Current Biology, 31, 1221-1233.e9. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.005.
  • EKSTROM, A.D. ET AL. 2003. Cellular networks underlying human spatial navigation, Nature, 425, 184–188. doi:10.1038/nature01955.1.
  • GRIEVES, R.M. ET AL. 2016. Place field repetition and spatial learning in a multicompartment environment, Hippocampus, 26, 118–134. doi:10.1002/hipo.22496.
  • GRIEVES, R.M. ET AL. 2021. Irregular distribution of grid cell fields in 3D volumetric space: summary dataset and analysis package. Mendeley. doi:10.17632/s3h7n7jyr4.1.
  • HAFTING, T. ET AL. 2005. Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex, Nature, 436, 801–806.
  • HARLAND, B. ET AL. 2017. Lesions of the head direction cell system increase hippocampal place field repetition, Current Biology, 27, 2706-2712.e2. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.071.
  • HAYMAN, R. ET AL. 2011. Anisotropic encoding of three-dimensional space by place cells and grid cells., Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1182–8. doi:10.1038/nn.2892.
  • HAYMAN, R.M. ET AL. 2003. Context-specific acquisition of location discrimination by hippocampal place cells, Eur.J.Neurosci., 18, 2825–2834.
  • HÖLSCHER, C. ET AL. 2006. Up the down staircase: Wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 284–299. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.002.
  • HORNER, A.J. ET AL. 2016. The role of spatial boundaries in shaping long-term event representations, Cognition [Preprint]. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.013.
  • HOWARD, M.W. AND EICHENBAUM, H. 2015. Time and space in the hippocampus, Brain Research, 1621, 345–354. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.10.069.
  • JACOB, P.-Y. ET AL. 2017. An independent, landmark-dominated head-direction signal in dysgranular retrosplenial cortex, Nature Neuroscience, 20, 173–175. doi:10.1038/nn.4465.
  • JACOBS, J. ET AL. 2013. Direct recordings of grid-like neuronal activity in human spatial navigation, Nature Neuroscience, 16, 1188–1190. doi:10.1038/nn.3466.
  • JEFFERY, K.J. 2019. Urban architecture: A cognitive neuroscience perspective, The Design Journal, 22, 837–852.
  • KRUPIC, J. ET AL. 2015. Grid cell symmetry is shaped by environmental geometry, Nature, 518, 235. doi:10.1038/nature14153.
  • KUNZ, L. ET AL. 2015. Reduced grid-cell–like representations in adults at genetic risk for Alzheimer’s disease, Science (New York, N.Y.), 350, 430–433.
  • MACDONALD, C.J. ET AL. 2011. Hippocampal ‘time cells’ bridge the gap in memory for discontiguous events, Neuron, 71, 737–749.
  • MOSER, E.I. AND MOSER, M.B. 2008. A metric for space, Hippocampus, 18, 1142–1156. doi:10.1002/hipo.20483.
  • MULLER, R.U. AND KUBIE, J.L. 1987. The effects of changes in the environment on the spatial firing of hippocampal complex-spike cells, Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 1951–1968.
  • O’KEEFE, J. AND BURGESS, N. 1996. Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons, Nature, 381, 425–428. doi:10.1038/381425a0.
  • O’KEEFE, J. AND NADEL, L. 1978. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • PAGE, H.J.I. AND JEFFERY, K.J. 2018. Landmark-based updating of the head direction system by retrosplenial cortex: A computational model, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 12, 1–17. doi:10.3389/fncel.2018.00191.
  • RADVANSKY, G.A. AND COPELAND, D.E. 2006. Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Situation models and experienced space, Memory and Cognition, 34, 1150–1156. doi:10.3758/BF03193261.
  • SAMSONOVICH, A. AND MCNAUGHTON, B.L. 1997. Path integration and cognitive mapping in a continuous attractor neural network model, J.Neurosci., 5900–5920.
  • SCOVILLE, W.B. AND MILNER, B. 1957. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 20, 11–21. doi:10.1136/jnnp.20.1.11.
  • SHARP, P.E. AND KOESTER, K. 2008. Lesions of the mammillary body region severely disrupt the cortical head direction, but not place cell signal, Hippocampus, 18, 766–784. doi:10.1002/hipo.20436.
  • SPIERS, H.J. ET AL. 2015. Place field repetition and purely local remapping in a multicompartment environment, Cerebral Cortex, 25, 10–25. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht198.
  • TAUBE, J.S. AND BURTON, H. 1995. Head direction cell activity monitored in a novel environment and during a cue conflict situation., Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 1953–1971.
  • TAUBE, J.S., MULLER, R.U. AND RANCK, J.B. 1990. Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats.1. Description and quantitative analysis, Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 420–435.
  • TOLMAN, E.C. 1948. Cognitive maps in rats and men., Psychological Review, 55, 189–208. doi:10.1037/h0061626.
  • TULVING, E. 1983. Elements of Episodic Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • YOGANARASIMHA, D. AND KNIERIM, J.J. 2005. Coupling between place cells and head direction cells during relative translations and rotations of distal landmarks, Experimental Brain Research, 160, 344–359. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-2016-9.
  • ZHANG, N., GRIEVES, R.M. AND JEFFERY, K.J. 2021. Environment symmetry drives a multidirectional code in rat retrosplenial cortex, bioRxiv, 1–18.