Difference between revisions of "Postdigital Architecture. What Now?!"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| − | [[File: | + | [[File:DCIO2022_S3-0_M-Colletti.png|center|800px]] |
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Keywords= | =Keywords= | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[digital design research]], [[postdigital design]], [[trans-dimensionalities]] |
=Bibliography= | =Bibliography= | ||
* | * | ||
Latest revision as of 18:53, 6 July 2023
| 
| 
| 
Abstract
The hyphenated term ‘post-digital’ was coined over twenty years ago by sonic artist Kim Cascone as a means of thinking about the aesthetics of the time beyond the digital revolution in electronic music, and then adopted in the arts, media, and architecture. In architecture, the term has been adopted to promote an anti-digital ‘downgrading’ aesthetic agenda: as post(minus)digital. However, if understood as post(plus)digital – in short: postdigital – the expression appears to be indicative of an evolution of the digital beyond its first implementation as numerical or virtual alternative to traditional analogue design and making techniques. What postdigital traits and characteristics can be identified? How can they be implemented in architectural design? Why does it matter?
Keywords
digital design research, postdigital design, trans-dimensionalities
