Difference between revisions of "Axial lines (Space Syntax)"
From Design Computation
Abel Maciel (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:Space Syntax The syntactic analysis is based on the configuration of the axial lines, which are the fewest longest straight lines that cover the street network (...") |
Abel Maciel (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The syntactic analysis is based on the configuration of the axial lines, which are the fewest longest straight lines that cover the street network (Hillier and Hanson 1984). | The syntactic analysis is based on the configuration of the axial lines, which are the fewest longest straight lines that cover the street network (Hillier and Hanson 1984). | ||
| + | The axial line is defined as the longest straight-line representing the maximum extension of a point of space. It can be objectively created. | ||
=Synonyms= | =Synonyms= | ||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
[http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/101/1/hillier-etal-1987-creating-life.pdf Hillier, B. and Hanson, J. (1984) The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.] | [http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/101/1/hillier-etal-1987-creating-life.pdf Hillier, B. and Hanson, J. (1984) The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Vaughan L., Geddes I. (2009), "Urban form and deprivation: a contemporary proxy for Charles Booth's analysis of poverty" Radical Statistics 99 46-73 | ||
Latest revision as of 17:14, 22 February 2020
The syntactic analysis is based on the configuration of the axial lines, which are the fewest longest straight lines that cover the street network (Hillier and Hanson 1984).
The axial line is defined as the longest straight-line representing the maximum extension of a point of space. It can be objectively created.
Synonyms
Cross-References
Recommended Reading
Hillier, B. and Hanson, J. (1984) The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vaughan L., Geddes I. (2009), "Urban form and deprivation: a contemporary proxy for Charles Booth's analysis of poverty" Radical Statistics 99 46-73
